|
|
|
| { Meetings | O Outings |
Lake County’s Waters Still Unprotected![]()
The Good, the Bad and the Ugly
|
The Illinois Fox River Chain O' Lakes ranks as the most popular inland waterway in the entire United States, with over 7,100 acres of water, 15 lakes and 45 miles of river. This important part of Lake County accommodates every water-borne activity including boating, swimming, waterskiing, hunting and fishing, appeals to everyone. But it seems that the village of Antioch has a hard time protecting these waters from sediment runoff and phosphorus. In 2003 when construction was going on for the Wal-Mart store at Rt. 173 and Deep Lake Rd. in Antioch, erosion control measures were incapable of containing storm water on the premises, resulting in runoff to wetlands south of Rt. 173. Those wetlands flow into East Loon Lake which is part of the Sequoit Creek watershed. Wal-Mart paid a civil penalty of $75,000 for contributing to water pollution of the wetland and lake while Antioch was fined $85,000 by the IEPA for not properly controlling sediment loaded storm water runoff from the construction site. Antioch sold its citizens on Wal-Mart and its increased tax revenue, but sold out the Sequoit Creek watershed in the process. The village has grown considerably over the last 50 years since it built its sewage treatment plant. Population has increased from about 2,000 to 13,500 over that same period. This year they broke ground on a new Sewage Treatment Plant (STP) expansion project that will increase capacity and meet requirements of the IEPA after being placed on a critical review list. The Woods and Wetlands group met with the village in August 2005 in an effort to negotiate a reduction in phosphorus and reduce the impacts to Lake Marie. Law requires that Antioch not degrade Sequoit Creek, and specifically that they not further degrade the already impaired waters of Lake Marie with more phosphorus and suspended solids. We shared our concerns with the IEPA, but both parties have chosen not to take any of our recommendations to improve that plant. Because the outflow of the plant goes directly into Sequoit Creek and travels downstream about a mile to Lake Marie, it has a direct effect on the amount of phosphorus that gets into the Chain O' Lakes. Not all forms of phosphorus are created equal. Some forms of phosphorus are highly soluble and will be immediately available for uptake by algae. Sewage treatment plant effluents are almost always made up of the most soluble forms of phosphorus. The Clean Water Act calls for the development of a list of impaired waters, and Lake Marie, along with all other lakes on the Chain, is listed for its high phosphorus levels. To address the impairment, the IEPA will be creating technical analyses, TMDLs>>, indicating how they will restore the waters to their full intended use. But the IEPA has given Antioch the go ahead for the plant expansion before the creation of a TMDL nutrient budget for Lake Marie, and thus put the cart before the horse, making phosphorus reduction options much more limited. The expansion of the centrally located STP is certainly an improvement for downtown Antioch and any future development, but not so for Lake Marie and other lakes on the Chain. More recently, the village and Antioch Township have been in the process of building the Tim Osmond Sports Complex>>, named after late State Rep. Timothy H. Osmond, who died in 2002. In August of last year, the area had several heavy rains, resulting in a lot of soil runoff from the sports park. Sediment-saturated water turned Sequoit Creek brown all the way to Lake Marie. More recently, in May of this year, there have been other incidents of erosion and sediment coming off the park. In an erosion and sediment control report from engineering consultants Gewalt Hamilton Associates, on May 2nd, best management practices for general erosion control were not being used. Other observations were that the detention basin(s) and sediment basin(s) were not adequately stabilized. Controlling sediment runoff and lowering phosphorus levels in Lake Marie are two of the biggest challenges facing the village of Antioch. One positive outcome of our meetings with Antioch was the establishment of a ban>> on lawn fertilizers containing phosphorus>>. According to the IEPA, many soils contain sufficient quantities of phosphorus to support healthy lawns, so fertilizing with additional phosphorus content is not necessary. We would encourage our members to make neighbors aware of the problems phosphorus can cause to our lakes and streams. And with all the development taking place throughout Lake County, we should all be on the watch for sediment runoff and report occurrences to us, SMC and the IEPA. |
Lake County’s Waters Still Unprotected![]()
Pattern of Pollution
|
Those suffering with properties flooded with polluted waters along the Chain O’ Lakes can blame in part Antioch’s failure to retain stormwater at the new Osmond Sports Park (OSP>>). It was allowed to spill into Sequoit Creek and into the Chain just as flood waters were rising in early June. After the events described by Larry and Eric in the last two editions (Lake County's Broken Water Protection System) and by John (above), about how the site polluted Sequoit Creek last August, we pushed Stormwater Management Commission (SMC) to suspend Antioch’s authority over stormwater projects. SMC finally took action, and Antioch has been on probation since last October>>. After the blatant violations that had previously occurred at the Wal-Mart site, it was clear to all at the September SMC meeting that Antioch should have been suspended earlier. We hold a few members of the SMC Board responsible for failing to protect our waters then, and call on the Mayors who vote for their district SMC representatives, especially in Beach Park, Waukegan, Zion, Antioch, Fox Lake, Hainesville, Lake Villa, Lakemoor, Lindenhurst, Old Mill Creek, Round Lake (Beach, Heights and Park), Volo, and also the County Board, to choose more responsible SMC Board Members. Members should be willing to protect the communities’ public waters, while giving permits to those who lay open their soils and risk erosion. Instead, their initial response was to try to intimidate residents by restricting public comment, and by placing an armed guard in the public meeting room. Our understanding of the term “probation” is a time of increased assistance, heightened expectations, intense scrutiny, and certain consequences. After reviewing the performance of both Antioch and SMC, it’s clear that “business as usual,” not “probation” has been in effect at this major site. Moreover, the repeated failure of this site reveals the kind of flawed design, and lax enforcement that results from SMC Board Members who do not honor their responsibility to the public. Antioch is the first SMC “certified community” we know of ever to be placed on probation, so considering the high profile of this case, we present this as evidence that the present safeguards in the WDO protecting our lakes and rivers from flooding and pollution amount to brinksmanship, and that a posture of laissez faire exists at SMC. The WDO has been weakened by its lax Board, and even Antioch was able to point out one of its shortcomings. These include:
When we noticed that the OSP site polluted the creek again on May 2 of this year, we took pictures of its incomplete and dismantled erosion control systems, reported them to SMC, and called a few trusted SMC Board Members. As this photo shows, Antioch had relied on a small piece of plywood to prevent millions of gallons of water from polluting Sequoit Creek through a 30 inch culvert in a pond in the buffer. SMC issued a list of corrections to be made within 10 days to Antioch, but denied that there was a problem to us. We decided to FOIA request the OSP site plans and permits from SMC and Antioch to try to understand why it has repeatedly polluted Sequoit Creek. We were amazed to find that SMC did not know who the Designated Erosion Control Inspector was, and that their file lacked any plan sets or permits. How could they enforce if they didn’t know the plan or issue permits? Antioch delayed for weeks so that they could “determine if the [records] are exempt from disclosure or revealed only with appropriate deletions” - to protect the United States from terrorism. When we finally got their response it also lacked the plan sets and permits. Rather than sue Antioch under FOIA, we’re asking you to help keep our villages and SMC more accountable. See our Antioch OSP Timeline to follow this as we review the documents we have been allowed to see. Please plan to attend the next SMC meeting on Thursday, July 10, at 7:00 p.m. at SMC offices, 333 Peterson Rd., Ste. D conference room, Libertyville, and send us a note saying you're coming. We've asked to have this issue put on the agenda, and will present our best information then. |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Win For Preserves: Olympics Moving to Private Lands![]()
|
At our last installment of the Chicago 2016 Equestrian Olympics planning saga, the Lake County Forest Preserve District had refused to admit that bulldozing and paving significant portions of the Lakewood Forest Preserve for the (proposed) 2016 Olympics was a bad idea. They had moved their planned cross-country trail a few feet away from nesting, endangered sandhill cranes and hinted at moving the events to another preserve (Raven Glen), but were holding tight to the idea that bulldozers, a 15,000 seat stadium and hundreds of thousands of Olympic visitors were compatible with these natural areas. The Chicago Olympic Committee was aware of the issues and in April announced that if Chicago wins the 2016 Olympics, the equestrian events will be held at Tempel Farms in Wadsworth, not in a public forest preserve! Thanks to all of you who brought the Olympic planners to their senses. Sierra Club is against citing the Olympics in or adjacent to any natural area. It’s strange that the Olympic organizers would make such a plan, especially at a time when the Olympics make such a fuss about their environmental sensitivity. However, I think it was almost inevitable that this equestrian plan would be moved. Not because of the environmental sensitivity, but because of the bad publicity. Chicago is competing against a number of wonderful cities, including Madrid, Rio de Janeiro and Tokyo. Flaws are a bad thing, and bad publicity is something to be fixed. In the case of the Lakewood equestrian facility, there has been ongoing bad publicity and many angry local citizens willing to voice their concerns. On top of the environmental flaws was the obvious poor quality of the proposed facilities. In a metro area which has a number of international equestrian venues, it was very strange that the Committee would pick a completely undeveloped plot of land like Lakewood. Perhaps there was the wish to build a state-of-the-art facility from scratch or, more likely, Chicago-land politics had a hand in the selection process. This issue became apparent when the Olympic organizers publicly began discussions with real equestrian facilities in DuPage County. At the same time, the FP District was limited and couldn’t improve their plans substantially due to the environmental problems and public outcry. Finally, Chicago 2016 made a choice that gave them double rewards—Tempel Farms is a ready-to-go world class venue which equestrians will love and no public forest preserve will be ruined for a 2 week sporting event. It was an interesting story. A county board seduced by the bright lights, publicity and money of the Olympics; Olympic organizers who believed that the promise of “The Games” could overwhelm all opposition; and we, the public, who disagreed and spoke up. |
YouTube Presents![]()
Into the Watershed Part 2
|
This is one of the short films we showed at our winter W&W Film Festival. It's about the water in Lake Macatawa, MI, but it applies to the lakes here in our territory too. Click once to activate it, and again to start the video.
|
US Mail Slow, Switch to E-Mail![]()
|
Delivery of this newsletter has gotten better, but it’s still slow. And we just can’t count on having it delivered when we need it to be. Meanwhile, the cost of postage just keeps going up. Our solution? Sign up to get your newsletter by e-mail. It’s fast, and it’s free! We’ll send you these same great stories and events, with better pictures and richer content - in time to respond and participate! To sign up, address an e-mail message to and then include the following commands in the body of the message : SUBSCRIBE IL-WWG-ALERTS firstname lastname (inserting your first name and last name). If things don’t improve, we might decide to stop printing and mailing, and rely solely on e-mail and our website to get the news to you. So don’t miss out! Subscribe now. Be sure to follow up with the town where you live, or your membership number. Worried that you might have missed an issue? We post this newsletter here on our website too. Bookmark our website: |
Members are invited to join the W&W group's e-mail lists. On the ALERTS list you will receive infrequent timely posts from the Group Chair (only), primarily on local issues. Some of these appear on this website, and if you subscribe you will learn about them in time to help. The ISSUES list allows you to share in a discussion with other W&Wers. To sign up, just visit each of these websites and click Join :
We do not share e-mail address lists, and you can remove yourself from either list at any time.
Here's the printed version of this issue of the W&W News in pdf ». It's 144 kB and you'll need the Adobe Acrobat Reader to view it. If you want to give a copy to a friend who doesn't have internet access, we suggest printing this pdf rather than this web page. This issue of the W&W News is also found in print as part of Volume 49 #3 » of the Illinois Chapter's Lake & Prairie newsletter. It's ?.?MB.
Another option is to take this on your PDA with AvantGo », a free service that lets you download and synch web pages with your PDA. Just have it synch this one from Woods & Wetlands News #60 » .
Contact the Group Chair to discuss the issue and how much space to take, or send your finished article directly to our Newsletter Designer.
To return to the Main selection page, click
Go Back to Main