|
|
|
| { Meetings | O Outings |
After watching him rack up IEC environmental voting scores of only 30% in 2003 and 25% in 2004, we’re glad to see incumbent State Representative Robert Churchill retiring from his IL state house seat. To our dismay, he hopes to perpetuate his dismal record, and now seeks a seat in the U.S. House of Representatives. While stepping down he has selected Barbara Oilschlager as his Republican successor. So far she has shown equally little regard for environmental issues. The good news is that this open seat gives the voters of the 62nd District in north-central Lake County the exciting possibility of electing a state representative who is truly committed to preservation of the environment! This year, the residents of this state house district have the opportunity to vote for a qualified, pro-environmental candidate in the primary regardless of whether they chose a Republican or a Democratic primary ballot. With two good candidates to choose from, the Sierra Club has taken the unusual decision to endorse the primary bids of both: Republican Sandy Cole and Democrat Sharyn Elman. |
Sandy Cole has served on the Lake County Board and the Lake County Forest
Preserve District since 1996, and has gathered and demonstrated mastery over the spectrum of policy challenges
important to constituents in the 62nd. Cole has a long record of preserving open space and wetland areas. Going
forward, she intends to focus on Lake Michigan watershed and mercury pollution. A long-time member of the Sierra
Club, Cole has consistently won our endorsement, and has also been endorsed in this race by the Illinois Chapter
of REP America (Republicans for Environmental Protection). |
Gurnee resident Sharyn Elman is a former radio and TV journalist who has
shown an interest in a broad range of environmental issues. A breast cancer survivor, Elman has a particular
interest in the links between environmental and human health. Elman is committed to finding practical and
effective ways to reduce pollution through regional transportation planning.
Two good candidates presents a risk of splitting the conservation vote, so this should be seen as a challenge as much as it is a luxury. Unless we mobilize to support these better candidates, Oilschlager might steal the prize. Please lend your support. |
| Citizens for Sandy Cole 1315 Osage Orange Road Grayslake, IL 60030 (847) 548-0877 www.sandycole.net |
Friends of Sharyn Elman P.O. Box 8304 Gurnee, IL 60031 (847) 528-6918 www.voteelman.com |
G. W. Bush and main anti-environmental henchman, Congressman Richard Pombo, are midway in their
effort to gut the Endangered Species Act (ESA), perhaps the world’s best wildlife protection law. I’m not kidding
when I say this is half complete - Pombo’s “Threatened and Endangered Species Recovery Act” passed the U. S. House
of Representatives in September, 229 to 193. North suburban Congressional representatives Mark Kirk and Melissa
Bean voted against this horrible bill, but it still got through and similar legislation will be voted on in the U.
S. Senate. Pombo’s law, if passed, would:
Pombo and Bush Interior Secretary Gale Norton are both pushing to make the ESA as toothless as possible. (Norton is most famous as the protégé of Reagan Interior Secretary Jim Watt, the prototypical anti-environmentalist. Norton went on to become Colorado Attorney General where she tried to have the ESA declared unconstitutional.) |
This new legislation is their most obvious attack, but just part of the administration’s 5 year
battle to emasculate the law. As noted in Ted Williams’ excellent Audubon Magazine article,
“There are three main strategies in the [Bush] administration's ESA end run: rigged and suppressed science;
sweetheart lawsuits in which the White House encourages legal action against the act, winks at the plaintiffs,
then gives up; and bizarre interpretations of the law that are inevitably struck down but delay recovery for
years.” Bush, Pombo and Norton are not the first, nor will they be the last, to attack the Endangered Species Act. The reason it still stands, and is as strong as it still is 33 years after passage, is because Americans believe in it. With this latest threat, it’s time to reassert your position with our federal legislators. Ask them to support the ESA and oppose any bill that would weaken protections for endangered species and habitat. Call your senators and congressional representative at the US Capitol Switchboard: (202) 224-3121. (To find out who your federal legislators are, go to this web site.)
|
There is a lot you can do to improve the quality of the air we breathe and stop
global warming. About a third of our air pollution comes from the power plants that generate electricity and
factories that make our stuff. Another third comes from the cars we drive and the lawn mowers we use.
The other third comes from our
furnaces, water heaters and appliances. Here are some surprises I discovered during two recent purchases.
If you want to stop global warming, before you buy that car, buy a more efficient furnace. You’ll also save money and live more comfortably. According to the EPA, upgrading from a standard 78% efficient furnace to a 90% efficient furnace for a 2000 square foot house will keep 12,000 lb of CO2 out of the air every year! Ditching your 22 mpg car and buying a 40 mpg car will only cut your CO2 by 6,000 lb – half as much. If you have a 25 year old furnace like I had, you’ll stop 20,000 lb of CO2! It will set you back around $4500, but even at present gas prices – expected to rise sharply – you’ll save the money back quickly. There are two ways of looking at payback. One assumes your present unit is dead, and you are choosing between paying for a standard 78% or a 90% efficient (AFUE) furnace. The difference is saved in only 2 years. If you look at the total cost, it’s still only 5-6 years.
Tragically, many new homeowners expecting to occupy their dream houses for decades are getting wasteful low efficiency furnaces. You can tell who has what as you drive by the back of the house. The intake and exhaust of high efficiency furnaces are a pair of plastic pipes at ground level, not a vent out the roof. This EPA payback calculator reminds you to include a programmable thermostat in the deal. While you’re at it, upgrade that old central air conditioner to at least SEER 13 for additional
savings in the summer. I chose a less expensive,
|
Now that you’ve evicted the thief in your utility closet, you are pre-qualified to
choose a car. Those of us who did our own engine repairs 20 years ago rose to the challenge when wires and
pollution controls took over the engine compartment. But even we gave up looking under the hood when engines
disappeared under stylish manifolds. Now there’s a new reason to raise the hood, and it doesn’t take a gear-head
to figure it out.
Everyone knows that a Prius gets more mpg than a Hummer, but few realize that every Prius is not
created equal. The EPA has posted a website that allows you to easily look up any car made since 2000. It lists
the different models and for each one gives the Emission Standard (LEV, BIN 5, BIN 3, SULEV, etc.) and the
Underhood Label ID (e.g.: 5FMXV02.31D4) that reveal whether that 2005 Ford Focus you’re looking at gets a stinky
2, or a respectable 9 score. If you’re buying a new car, it has just gotten a little easier.
Comparing several different used cars made in several different years by looking up each one separately can get laborious. Luckily the tabulated scores are available, and I’ve combined them for all years into one spreadsheet and sorted it by overall scores. You can find it in this on-line version of this W&W News at http://illinois.sierraclub.org/w&w/WWNews/docs/usedcarguide.xls. As you’d expect, hybrids top the list. But then there are some surprises. While their mpg is only in the 30’s, the Mazda3, Nissan Sentra, Hyundai Elantra, Kia Spectra and Ford Focus have clean enough emissions to rank them among the grubbier hybrids. So print out the first few pages and take it with you to the used car lot. You’ll make a difference. |
Members are invited to join the W&W group's e-mail lists. On the ALERTS list you will receive infrequent timely posts from the Group Chair (only), primarily on local issues. Some of these appear on this website, and if you subscribe you will learn about them in time to help. The ISSUES list allows you to share in a discussion with other W&Wers. To sign up, just visit each of these websites and click Join :
We do not share e-mail address lists, and you can remove yourself from either list at any time.
|
See Meetings for a map, and other Group meetings. |
| 2005 was an action-packed year for environmentalists everywhere, and especially in the North
Suburbs of Chicago. Locally, we reversed an attempt by Lake Forest and Costco to build a -big box-store on
important natural land adjacent to one of our best forest preserves. At the state level, we pushed back the
Illinois State Legislature’s powerful attempt to ruin state and county wetlands protections. And nationally, we
stopped (again) George Bush’s pet project, oil drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.
Notice that each of these victories were to stop something terrible, not to realize any new protections for wildlife, wild lands or the environment in which we live. That is, unfortunately, what you get when the drill, pave and burn gang rules our governmental bodies. It doesn't have to be that way, and, in fact, I think the trend is swinging back our way. The national security argument goes only so far when this security requires us to destroy the things we love. With so many trust me’s falling apart for our current leaders (many of whom are facing corruption charges and stiff jail sentences), the upcoming state and federal legislative sessions, as well as elections, will provide us a great opportunity to ring out the bad, bring in the good and, maybe, go on the offense. |
Our efforts are already bearing some fruit, as Governor Rod Blagojevich (up for reelection in
November) has proposed some great, new mercury reduction rules for Illinois’ coal-fired power plants. These rules
would require Illinois coal plants, to reduce mercury pollution by 90% by 2009. We'll need to push these rules to
assure they’re approved and finalized, but it feels nice to have the ball. Call your Illinois state legislators
and tell them you want to eliminate mercury pollution and support these new rules. You can find contact
information for your legislators at this website:
http://elections.il.gov/DistrictLocator/SelectSearchType.aspx
On the elections front, we've already started our selection and endorsement process meant to sort the good candidates from the bad. (Please see specific primary endorsements in this issue.) We'll also be actively helping our friends to get elected and publicizing who will or won’t protect the environment. To help us get the best elected, call or contact our Political Chair, Chuck Knight (847) 680-6437 at: www.polichair@illinois.sierraclub.org. As always, we depend on you push for environmental protection. At the very least, read our newsletter, vote for our endorsed candidates, and make phone calls to your legislators during crunch time. If you have an itch to get involved further (nearly all Sierra Club activists are volunteers), call or write us. Hope to hear from you! Larry Marvet, Conservation Chair, 847-537-2083 |
| Avian flu, HIV, West Nile virus, Monkey Pox, Ebola, SARS and others, are not frightening words,
but deadly human diseases. Interestingly, all are relatively recent arrivals on the world scene. Why? What is
happening in nature that is causing previously unknown or otherwise initially benign viruses to turn into human
killers?
Ebola – Prior to the mid-1970’s it was unheard of and then severe outbreaks in Sudan and the former Zaire killed approximately 440 people. Ebola infections of humans have been linked to direct contact with animals found dead in the rain forest, including gorillas, chimpanzees, monkeys, forest antelopes and others. SARS – It was thought that Asian civet cats were the source of this virus, but most scientists now believe it resides is in bat populations. The prescription is to do everything possible to avoid encroaching upon bat habitats and to resist using bats as food and medicine (as is practiced in some countries). West Nile Virus – The disease was unknown prior to 1937 when a Ugandan woman was infected. Birds are the unwilling hosts of the virus and if a bird is bitten by a common household mosquito which then infects a human, it can be potentially lethal. HIV – Over a long period of time viruses evolve to live with their long term hosts since if a virus kills off its host it will also die. For example chimpanzees in West Africa live compatibly with their HIV-like viruses. However, when we butcher them for bushmeat, the virus emerges in a new host, humans. The result has been a devastating global pandemic. |
Avian (Bird) Flu – Some authorities believe that avian influenza has been carried by
waterfowl, harmlessly, for hundreds of thousands of years. But in Hong Kong in 1997 it apparently moved from ducks
to people, portending the viruses’ capability of “travel at pandemic velocity through a densely urbanized and
mostly poor humanity” (Mike Davis, from The Monster at our Door).
Consider the forces that are bringing all these diseases front and center: worldwide travel, densely packed urban slums, especially in the third world, wetland destruction, unsustainable forest clearing, and factory farms where livestock and poultry are raised in overcrowded and oft-times filthy conditions. As we destroy more habitat, stresses on wildlife populations intensify as does human contact with them. When we develop unused land and remove wildlife, we create the conditions in which disease agents search for new hosts, including humans. Dr. Peter Daszak says, “Anytime you bring multiple species of animals together at high density and mix them with humans (for example, live animal markets), you set the stage for pathogens to jump between species and for an outbreak to occur." Once we understand that human activities drive disease emergence, through the wildlife trade, global travel, agricultural intensification or expansion into wildlife habitat, we can do more to protect ecosystems and preserve natural biodiversity, thereby limiting the ways in which we bring people, domestic animals and wildlife into closer contact. In this way we can reduce opportunities for these and unknown future diseases to emerge. Nature is incredibly resilient but these diseases show what happens when we relentlessly abuse it. |
| Woods & Wetlands Board Change Needs Your Approval! The proposed bylaws change below is one of the
ways your local Sierra Club group hopes to increase member participation and deal with our improving fortunes. As
you know, over the last year or so we’ve restarted regular general membership meetings, initiated regular meetings
of the Conservation Committee, increased the number and quality of our outings, and, most importantly, engaged
more members in our community activities.
With all these people and activities, we believed it time to increase the number of officers on our board. To now, we’ve had 5 elected board members for our Executive Committee (what we call ExCom). As we grow, more ExCom members will provide a more diverse range of opinions and lend additional hands to our projects. The new ExCom will increase to 7 members. |
But why stop at only seven? Saving our fragile environment relies on all of us coming together for
the environment and doing what it takes. If this passes, seven of your fellow members will soon be busy making
ways for all of our 2300 members to get involved, have fun, and make a difference.
Here is your first chance to help. Use the simple Special Election ballot below to vote whether to change our Bylaws to accept two more members to our Executive Committee. If two thirds of the votes we receive favor this change, we’ll be on the lookout to appoint two new ExCom members. You’re reading page 4 of this newsletter – could one of them be you? To vote, just cut out and use the ballot below, or simply write YES or NO on a scrap of paper. For joint memberships you can generate a second ballot so both members can vote. Put your ballots in an envelope and write your name(s) and address only on the envelope, which will be separated from your ballot (required for your vote(s) to be tallied). |
SPECIAL ELECTION BALLOT Increase the W&W Executive Committee from 5 to 7 members. YES ____________ NO ____________ Mail the envelope by April 29, 2006 to: Sierra Club W&W Bylaw Change Thanks! |
|
Here's the printed version of this issue of the W&W News in pdf. It's 428 kB and you'll need the Adobe Acrobat Reader to view it. If you want to give a copy to a friend who doesn't have internet access, we suggest printing this pdf rather than this web page.
Another option is to take this on your PDA with AvantGo, a free service that lets you download and synch web pages with your PDA. Just have it synch this one from http://illinois.sierraclub.org/w&w/wwnews/WWNewsletter46.html .
Contact the Group Chair to discuss the issue and how much space to take, or send your finished article directly to our Newsletter Designer.
To return to the Main selection page, click
Go Back to Main