| Libertyville Staff
Development Review Committee Report June 29, 2000 |
COPY |
CASE NUMBER: PC 99-34, PC 99-35, PC 99-36, PC 99-37, and PC 99-38
DATE FILED: September 8, 1999
REQUESTED ACTION:
| PC 99-34: | Request is for a Text Amendment to Section 6-3.3 of the Libertyville Zoning Code to include Electric Services as a Special Use in the 0-2 District. |
| PC 99-35: | Request is for a Text Amendment to Section 2-2 of the Libertyville Zoning Code to include a definition for Electric Services. |
| PC 99-36: | Request is for a Special Use Permit to allow the operation of a peaking power facility. |
| PC 99-37: | Request is for a Planned Development Concept Plan and Planned Development Final Plan for the construction and operation of a peaking power facility. |
| PC 99-38: | Request is for a Site Plan Permit to allow the construction of a peaking power facility. |
DOCUMENTS RECEIVED ON OCTOBER 14, 1999:
Addendum to Land Use Application and supporting documentation.
Request for modification of requirements of Section 6-3.4(1') of the
Libertyville Zoning
Ordinance requiring exterior walls of all buildings to a height of
7 feet be of architectural masonry.
APPLICANT INFORMATION
| Applicant: | Indeck-Libertyville, LLC |
| Owner: | The Northern Trust Company, successor by merger to the Northern Trust Bank / Lake Forest National Association, as Trustee under Trust No. 8485 |
| Address: | Parts of Lots 2 and 4 in the Mallory Industrial Campus |
SITE INFORMATION:
| Location: | Mallory Drive, both north and south of the roadway | ||||||||
| Current Zoning: | 0-2, Office, Manufacturing, and Distribution Park District | ||||||||
| Size: | Approximately 17.56 acres | ||||||||
| Surrounding Zoning: |
|
||||||||
| Land Use Plan: | Office, Distribution, and Light Manufacturing | ||||||||
| Road Classification: | Mallory Drive is a local industrial street | ||||||||
| Physical Characteristics: | The site is currently undeveloped. |
STAFF ANALYSIS:
Zoning:
Over the past eight months, the Plan Commission of the Village of Libertyville has received testimony both proponent and opponent for the zoning requests flied by Indeck-Libertyville. LLC. Traditionally, the Development Review Committee (DRC) prepares a Staff recommendation on land use issues prior to a public hearing to assist the Commission in its deliberations. Due to the complexity of this project, it was determined that Staff would wait to make a recommendation on zoning issues until such time that the Plan Commission received all testimony from the petitioner, the public, and Village consultants. As these portions of the hearings have been completed, the DRC provides its analysis on the five items requiring Plan Commission recommendations to the Village Board of Trustees.
| 1. | PC 99-34: | Request is for a Text Amendment to Section 6-3.3 of the Libertyville Zoning Code to include Electric Services as a Special Use in the 0-2 District. |
| 2. | PC 99-35: | Request is for a Text Amendment to Section 2-2 of the Libertyville Zoning Code to include a definition for Electric Services. |
The basic issue before the Plan Commission is; whether the Village of Libertyville should amend its Zoning Ordinance to allow "Electric Services" as a Special Use in the 0-2 District. The 0-2, Office, Manufacturing, and Distribution Park District lists as its purpose the following "The 04, Office, Manufacturing and Distribution Park District is established to provide for the development of high quality mixed-use office, manufacturing, and distribution activities located and designed in campus style settings.". Opponents to this proposal have pointed out that the 0-2 District is listed under Article 6, entitled Office Districts. Titles to these zoning districts, however, ate merely intended to be broadly illustrative of the uses identified within the district. The body of the 0-2 zoning section of the Zoning Code lists 23 manufacturing, fabrication, processing, assembly and alteration limited permitted uses in the 0-2 District. These uses include manufacturing of alcoholic beverages, bakery products, boots and shoes, bottled and canned soft drinks and carbonated waters, computer and office equipment, electronic and other electric equipment, farm and garden machinery and equipment, furniture and fixtures, millwork, veneer, plywood, and structure wood members, motorcycles, bicycles, and parts, printing, publishing and allied industries, sugar and confectionery products and textile mill products, among others. Staff enumerates these items here for the purpose of bringing to the Plan Commission's attention the fact that nearly all of the uses just listed are also permitted in the I-1 District which is by definition a more land intensive district. It is clear that the intent of the 0-2 District is to be mixed-use area, with combinations of offices and light industry. The land uses arc determined by the location of the property.
While the 0-2 District hosts a number of major office developments such
as the Prime Group development on Winchester Road, it also is home to Motorola
and US Gypsum. The trend of development in the northwest industrial/office
area has been towards a mixture of both office and industrial uses along
Winchester Road and Route 45. Although the 0-2 District also lists day
care centers, financial institutions, offices, and limited retail trade
as permitted uses, the Mallory Industrial Campus, in Staff's opinion, does
not readily lend itself to these uses This is simply due to location. Properties
that are subject to these types of uses
traditionally arc adjacent to major collector or arterial streets which
would carry the amount of traffic necessary to support such organizations.
Mallory Drive is a local industrial street located south of Route 137 with
access only to Harris Road, and does not lend itself readily to these uses.
It is, however, an appropriate location for industrial uses.
In determining whether Electrical Services is a compatible use in the 0-2 District, Staff relies, -in part. upon the report of the Village consultants. One of the main issues covered in the months of testimony was whether the use and enjoyment of adjacent properties would be adversely affected by the proposed amendments. Of these issues, air emissions was one of the major themes. The Village consultants found that "The emissions from this Facility would not adversely effect the air shed downwind of the facility or those within that air shed.". They also found that ‘Such a conclusion appears to be scientifically valid and may be accepted by the Commission at a substantial indication that increased human health risks are not anticipated due to plant emissions." In regard to potential noise issues, the consultants were clear that with a proper mufflering system with a specific dba design, the plant would not have an adverse effect on the area. They also found "In all of the cases for which the consultant team is aware, there is no scientifically defensible documented evidence that siting, -construction, and operations of peaking power facilities have a quantifiable adverse effect on adjoining property values."
Staff concludes from the findings of the Village consultants that future
orderly development of adjacent properties would not be adversely affected
as property values and life-safety issues would not be factors, and therefore,
supports the inclusion of Electric Services as a Special Use in the 0-2,
Office, Manufacturing, and Distribution Park District.
| 3. | PC 99-36: | Request is for a Special Use Permit to allow the operation of a peaking power facility. |
| 4. | PC 99-37: | Request is for a Planned Development Concept Plan and Planned Development Final Plan for the construction and operation of a peaking power facility. |
| 5. | PC 99-38: | Request is for a Site Plan Permit to allow the construction of a peaking power facility. |
These three requests concern whether or not the Plan Commission should recommend approval for Indeck-Libertyville, LLC to construct a peaker power facility in the Mallory Industrial Park. The Standards for Special Use Permits and Planned Developments were testified to and discussed at length during the public hearing process In regard to the Special Use Permit, the majority of the discussions centered around whether this project would have any adverse impact or interference with surrounding development. As previously stated, the Village consultants found that with implementation of proper development conditions, that this use would not have an adverse impact or interfere with surrounding development Staff agrees with this analysis and has provided proposed development conditions for the Indeck proposal. Of specific interest to ensure there is no adverse impact, or interference with surrounding development. Staff highlights the following requirements:
In regard to the request for a Planned Development and Site Plan Permit, the petitioner is proposing to actually lower the site to lessen the visual impact of the facility. The Zoning Code states that uses in the 0-2 District should be operated entirely within an enclosed building. Staff supports the modification to this requirement under a planned development as containing this entire facility under one roofed structure would require a massive building which would have a much larger impact on the visual aesthetics of the area. The painting of the facility to match the background of the area as proposed is a much wiser alternative The landscaping and berming proposed will assist in buffering this site from any immediate uses. Specifics on landscaping and berming will be discussed before the Appearance Review Commission, who will hold a public meeting on this issue after completion of the Plan Commission hearings.
The petitioner has discussed other modifications to requirements of the Code, including relaxation of the stipulation that the first seven feet in height be constructed of architectural masonry. Staff supports this modification due to the berming and landscaping proposed in that a casual observer will not be able to seethe first seven feet of height of these buildings. In addition, the petitioner has stated that they would not be able to meet the performance standard regarding noise, which states "Any activity or operation of any use producing noise (other than ordinary vehicular noise) shall be conducted so that no noise from the activity or operation shall be detectable at any point off of the zoning lot on which the use is located.". Staff agrees that this is a virtually unobtainable standard for any use, including residential, in that even the noise from a lawnmower or an air conditioning condensing unit can be easily detectable off of the zoning lot. It is Staff's feeling that the intent of such a performance standard is to simply require that uses not produce noise which would have an adverse impact on adjoining properties Through the Design Standards set forth by the Village consultants, Staff concludes that this facility will not produce any adverse impact on said properties-
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
In conclusion, and based upon testimony and reports at the public hearings,
Staff recommends that the Plan Commission recommend that the Village Board
of Trustees: 1) APPROVE a request for a Text Amendment to Section 6-3.3
of the Libertyville Zoning Code to include Electric Services as a Special
Use in the 0-2 District; 2) APPROVE a request for a Text Amendment to Section
2-2 of the Libertyville Zoning Code to include a definition for Electric
Services; 3) APPROVE a Special Use Permit, Planned Development Concept
and Final Plan, and Site Plan Permit to allow Indeck-Libertyville LLC to
construct a peaker power facility in the Mallory Industrial Campus, subject
to the following development conditions: