|
Woods & Wetlands Alert
Libertyville Power Plant
July 13th, 1999
|
|
To return to the Alert selection page, click
For more recent and
additional information of this topic, click
ALERT
Please write to the US Army Corps of Engineers and request that they
deny application 19990678 for the destruction of 2.14 and impact of 3.15
acres of wetlands by Indeck Power. Please also contact your Libertyville
trustees and ask them to oppose this unwelcome use of open space in the
village.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Chicago District, Regulatory Branch
Attn: 199900678, Ms. Marcy Gordon
111 North Canal Street, 6th Floor
Chicago, IL 60606-7206
FAX: 312-353-4110
312-353-6400 x4032 |
Village of Libertyville
118 W. Cook Ave.
Libertyville, 60048
362-2430, FAX 362-9453
Trustee Jennie L. LeGates: 680-7292
Trustee Dean Larson 367-5857
Trustee David A Giza 816-1602
Trustee Jeffrey A. Harger 367-6985
Trustee Gary Franzen 367-7766
Trustee William Westerman 680-0758 |
EXPLANATION
Indeck Power wants to erect a large electricity generating plant on
the north edge of Libertyville.
They have applied for a permit from the US Army Corps of Engioneers
(USACOE) to destroy and impact wetlands. We had until July 18 to submit
comments, and submitted a Comment Period Extension
Request Letter .
Assuming they receive a permit from the USACOE, they will not be allowed
to build the plant without receiving a zoning change from the Village of
Libertyville. This process will begin when they apply for the permit, and
will include several public hearings held by the zoning department. The
Trustees are your representatives. They are influential, and contacting
them will convince them to express their opposition during this process.
Check back here for hearing dates, but begin calling your Trustees now.
We oppose siting of this plant in this location for these reasons:
-
Zoning: This land was zoned Suburban on the 1994 Lake County Framework
Plan, and is now zoned O2 by Libertyville. The plant cannot be built without
petitioning and receiving Special Use zoning from the village. There are
presently 5 schools and 22 neighborhoods within 3 miles. This type of heavy
industry is incompatible with surrounding neighborhoods.
-
Greenfields vs. Brownfields: Holes in the ground at the site evidence
Indeck's concern that the soils be pollution free to avoid any possibly
ground contamination clean-up cost liability. We favor siting industrial
facilities on ground that already shows the scars of industry rather than
sacrificing virgin soil, and productive wetlands. It is not in the public
interest to promote new industry that destroys our rich soils while used
industrial sites are abandoned and languish.
-
Noise: This type of "peaker" power plant uses huge jet engines,
and operates them daily throughout the summer - up to 2,000 hours. The
noise will be a dull roar within a quarter mile, and audible within 3 miles.
-
Pollution: This plant will release over 300 tons of regulated pollutants
into the air we breathe. This includes 173 tons of smog forming NOX
(nitrous oxides), 105 tons of poisonous CO (carbon monoxide), 20 tons of
choking PM10 (particulate matter), and 10 tons of corrosive SO2
(sulfur dioxide). Although this plant would pollute less than the filthy
coal plants in operation in Illinois, it would still release over 100,000
tons of global warming CO2 per year during its 2,000 hours of
permitted operation. There are better options: electricity conservation,
efficiency, renewables.
-
Employment: The plant will be remotely operable, and provide only
2 jobs.
-
Loss of Topsoil: The rich topsoil deposited and retained in our
region by prairies is unstable when built upon because the organic matter
in it decomposes. Development of this site will call for large scale removal
of topsoil, with much of it likely shipped off site. In addition, displacement
of large amounts of topsoil are likely to result in wind and water erosion
carrying the soil off the site, degrading our streams and lakes.
-
Ugly: Two exhaust stacks rising 70 feet in the air to release their
toxic plumes.
-
Wetlands Destruction: Indeck has applied for a wetlands destruction
permit from the US Army Corps of Engineers for 3.151 acres of wetlands.
These wetlands will not be replaced locally, and the ecological and hydrological
value of the present wetlands will be lost. Instead, Indeck proposes ineffective
"in-lieu fee payments" and remote wetland mitigation banking. Historically,
less than 40% of mitigation wetlands have survived as wetlands, and only
a few percent have any ecological value. The USACOE should enforce section
404 of the clean water act, which requires no net loss of wetlands, and
exercise extreme reluctance to resort to mitigation until it is proved
to be an effective measure over a significantly long term. Indeck has also
failed to present an upland alternative in their application.
-
Loss of Savannas & Species: The site is presently covered with
prairie and groups of trees. Indeck will retain only 30% of the trees,
and construction of the massive buildings will obliterate the prairie.
The site has a rich native ecosystem where endangered plants and animals
might occur. Prairie Dock, Purple Coneflower, Prairie Coneflower, Bergamot,
Milkweed, Goldenrod, bunch grasses, hundreds of frogs, and other wildlife
live at the site. See Comment Letter for pictures.
The endangered species inventory of the site needs to be updated.
-
Water Consumption: The plant will require around 100,000 gallons
of water per day for coolant. This huge requirement will tax our water
supply infrastructure, deduct from our allocation of fresh water from Lake
Michigan, divert it into the local stormwater treatment system, and the
overburdened Des Plaines River. If drawn from the deep aquifer instead,
release of radioactive mineral content of the aquifer water becomes a concern.
Much of this water will be released as water vapor into the air, possibly
initiating fog around busy arterial roads.
-
Hazardous Debris: There are several broken tanks on the site which
might have released toxic materials into the soils. Disturbance of the
soils could mobilize these materials, or further release them into our
waters. This should be addressed by the EPA.
Be part of the solution:
-
Replace you appliances with more efficient ones. The money you save in
electricity bills will pay for your investment in a few years. Air conditioners
and refrigerators are the biggest opportunities. Computers now account
for 13% of usage. Turn them off when not in use. You can also take advantage
of ComEd's high efficiency fluorescent light bulb offer.
-
Help promote wind energy in our region.
This concludes the Action Alert.
To return to the Alert selection page, click
Send all comments concerning this action alert to the attention of Evan
Craig at auk@interaccess.com or
call 680-6437.
Every call counts.